<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re lit the blinkenlights</title>
	<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/10/07/re-lit-the-blinkenlights/</link>
	<description>I'm feeling pretty good about myself right about now.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/10/07/re-lit-the-blinkenlights/#comment-102</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 02:31:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/10/07/re-lit-the-blinkenlights/#comment-102</guid>
					<description>YellowTab is incapable of that kind of class act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>YellowTab is incapable of that kind of class act.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew Lampert</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/10/07/re-lit-the-blinkenlights/#comment-101</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 12:36:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/10/07/re-lit-the-blinkenlights/#comment-101</guid>
					<description>I agree Thom - I'd love to see a new BeBox. Not that I think YellowTab are necessarily the right people to make it - I'm certainly not inspired by their (Bernd's) ability to alienate significant swathes of the developer community. But I'd still love to think some company might one day do the BeBox name justice with a new system.

Just FYI too, in addition to my post about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bebox.nu/news.php?lookat=61&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;10th BeBox anniversary&lt;/a&gt; at The BeBox Zone  that you referenced on OSNews, I've also blogged a little more about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sgi.nu/diary/2005/10/06/10-years-of-the-bebox/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BeBox anniversary&lt;/a&gt; on my personal blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree Thom - I&#8217;d love to see a new BeBox. Not that I think YellowTab are necessarily the right people to make it - I&#8217;m certainly not inspired by their (Bernd&#8217;s) ability to alienate significant swathes of the developer community. But I&#8217;d still love to think some company might one day do the BeBox name justice with a new system.</p>
	<p>Just FYI too, in addition to my post about the <a href="http://www.bebox.nu/news.php?lookat=61" rel="nofollow">10th BeBox anniversary</a> at The BeBox Zone  that you referenced on OSNews, I&#8217;ve also blogged a little more about the <a href="http://www.sgi.nu/diary/2005/10/06/10-years-of-the-bebox/" rel="nofollow">BeBox anniversary</a> on my personal blog.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/10/07/re-lit-the-blinkenlights/#comment-100</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:24:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/10/07/re-lit-the-blinkenlights/#comment-100</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;It’s a bad advice to YellowTAB. It would be a waste of effort and money.&lt;/i&gt;

Of course it's a waste of money :). This wasn't a serious post at all :).

That doesn't mean I wouldn't want them to do it, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>It’s a bad advice to YellowTAB. It would be a waste of effort and money.</i></p>
	<p>Of course it&#8217;s a waste of money :). This wasn&#8217;t a serious post at all :).</p>
	<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean I wouldn&#8217;t want them to do it, however.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/10/07/re-lit-the-blinkenlights/#comment-99</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:17:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/10/07/re-lit-the-blinkenlights/#comment-99</guid>
					<description>These things don't pay Thom. It's a bad advice to YellowTAB. It would be a waste of effort and money.

People don't want &quot;geek boxes&quot;, people want computers that work and interoperate perfectly with other computers.

The reality is much more flat than we geeks want it to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>These things don&#8217;t pay Thom. It&#8217;s a bad advice to YellowTAB. It would be a waste of effort and money.</p>
	<p>People don&#8217;t want &#8220;geek boxes&#8221;, people want computers that work and interoperate perfectly with other computers.</p>
	<p>The reality is much more flat than we geeks want it to be.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

