<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simple logic</title>
	<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/</link>
	<description>I'm a mere, tiny, insignificant cog in a whole clockwork of stupidity. I'm the tiny cog that wants to break free. Seriously.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-322</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-322</guid>
					<description>I've seen UFOs...as in the strict definition: Unidentified Plying Object. It should do look and act like any aircraft I've ever seen. It doesn't mean it was an alient space craft but I couldn't figure out what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve seen UFOs&#8230;as in the strict definition: Unidentified Plying Object. It should do look and act like any aircraft I&#8217;ve ever seen. It doesn&#8217;t mean it was an alient space craft but I couldn&#8217;t figure out what it is.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-320</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-320</guid>
					<description>Again, I'm not saying it wasn't real. All I'm saying is that I don't trust the human mind, due to what I've learned at university. That's all.

We're now almost getting emotional. That's not a good thing, and harms the original intention of my post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Again, I&#8217;m not saying it wasn&#8217;t real. All I&#8217;m saying is that I don&#8217;t trust the human mind, due to what I&#8217;ve learned at university. That&#8217;s all.</p>
	<p>We&#8217;re now almost getting emotional. That&#8217;s not a good thing, and harms the original intention of my post.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-319</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-319</guid>
					<description>&amp;gt;especially not one from 15 years old, 

We were 17. And we didn't do drugs or drink, not my generation at least (small town kids).

&amp;gt;Numerous studies have indicated that group recollections are as fallacable as individual recollections

I am sorry, but we all saw the same thing _exactly_. That was NO hallucination.

As I said before, I am NOT saying that this was aliens. It could be Americans in an experiemental aircraft. But it was REAL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&gt;especially not one from 15 years old, </p>
	<p>We were 17. And we didn&#8217;t do drugs or drink, not my generation at least (small town kids).</p>
	<p>&gt;Numerous studies have indicated that group recollections are as fallacable as individual recollections</p>
	<p>I am sorry, but we all saw the same thing _exactly_. That was NO hallucination.</p>
	<p>As I said before, I am NOT saying that this was aliens. It could be Americans in an experiemental aircraft. But it was REAL.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-318</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-318</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Thom, don’t take me for a freaking idiot, please.&lt;/i&gt;

I'm not saying you are an idiot. I'm not being offencive. I'm just pointing out that human recollection, especially not one from 15 years old, is what I consider as scientific proof. I'm sorry.

As I said, I wouldn't trust &lt;i&gt;myself&lt;/i&gt; either.

&lt;i&gt;One mind can not be trusted indeed. But 6 can.&lt;/i&gt;

No. Numerous studies have indicated that group recollections are as fallacable as individual recollections. These tests usually consist of having a group of people witness a certain event, and then ask them afterwards what the hell'd happened. They all get some details right, but the most crucial things are always wrong and differ among the individuals of the group (ie. skin color, hair color, clothing colors, and even sex; car color, car brand, type, etc.).

&lt;i&gt;It has been filmed A LOT of times, some of them by national TV crews too (e.g. the Phoenix Lights case in 1997 which sparked the interest of the governor of the Arizona too).&lt;/i&gt;

I'm not talking about filming a few lights in the sky, Eugenia. I'm thinking about making a film in such a way that you actually &lt;i&gt;see&lt;/i&gt; the damn thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Thom, don’t take me for a freaking idiot, please.</i></p>
	<p>I&#8217;m not saying you are an idiot. I&#8217;m not being offencive. I&#8217;m just pointing out that human recollection, especially not one from 15 years old, is what I consider as scientific proof. I&#8217;m sorry.</p>
	<p>As I said, I wouldn&#8217;t trust <i>myself</i> either.</p>
	<p><i>One mind can not be trusted indeed. But 6 can.</i></p>
	<p>No. Numerous studies have indicated that group recollections are as fallacable as individual recollections. These tests usually consist of having a group of people witness a certain event, and then ask them afterwards what the hell&#8217;d happened. They all get some details right, but the most crucial things are always wrong and differ among the individuals of the group (ie. skin color, hair color, clothing colors, and even sex; car color, car brand, type, etc.).</p>
	<p><i>It has been filmed A LOT of times, some of them by national TV crews too (e.g. the Phoenix Lights case in 1997 which sparked the interest of the governor of the Arizona too).</i></p>
	<p>I&#8217;m not talking about filming a few lights in the sky, Eugenia. I&#8217;m thinking about making a film in such a way that you actually <i>see</i> the damn thing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-317</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-317</guid>
					<description>&amp;gt;If I see a light bobbing somewhere, I do not assume it’s a UFO. I assume it’s something else.

Thom, don't take me for a freaking idiot, please. We were 30 meters away from its circular body (with a diameter of about 15 meters), which was hovering about 10 meters in the air, above a house, without making *any* noise.

&amp;gt;the human mind cannot be trusted. 

One mind can not be trusted indeed. But 6 can.

&amp;gt;That’s the big problem with these so-called UFO encounters and abductee stories. 

I was never abducted, AFAIK. We just had a quick, 1-minute sighting and that's all. I don't believe all abduction stories either.

&amp;gt;Give me real-life proof of a UFO. Film the damn thing.

It has been filmed A LOT of times, some of them by national TV crews too (e.g. the Phoenix Lights case in 1997 which sparked the interest of the governor of the Arizona too). Granted, some of them are fabrications, some can be explained otherwise, but some, can not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&gt;If I see a light bobbing somewhere, I do not assume it’s a UFO. I assume it’s something else.</p>
	<p>Thom, don&#8217;t take me for a freaking idiot, please. We were 30 meters away from its circular body (with a diameter of about 15 meters), which was hovering about 10 meters in the air, above a house, without making *any* noise.</p>
	<p>&gt;the human mind cannot be trusted. </p>
	<p>One mind can not be trusted indeed. But 6 can.</p>
	<p>&gt;That’s the big problem with these so-called UFO encounters and abductee stories. </p>
	<p>I was never abducted, AFAIK. We just had a quick, 1-minute sighting and that&#8217;s all. I don&#8217;t believe all abduction stories either.</p>
	<p>&gt;Give me real-life proof of a UFO. Film the damn thing.</p>
	<p>It has been filmed A LOT of times, some of them by national TV crews too (e.g. the Phoenix Lights case in 1997 which sparked the interest of the governor of the Arizona too). Granted, some of them are fabrications, some can be explained otherwise, but some, can not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-316</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-316</guid>
					<description>You are limiting your hypothesis to only one, namely our, galaxy.

I'm talking about the universe &lt;i&gt;as a whole&lt;/i&gt;. That's a mighty important difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You are limiting your hypothesis to only one, namely our, galaxy.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m talking about the universe <i>as a whole</i>. That&#8217;s a mighty important difference.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-315</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-315</guid>
					<description>&amp;gt;I still heard no arguments that exposes the flaw in my reasoning.

Let's assume two things:
1. Infinite number of alien species exist.
2. SOME of them can do interstellar travel (in our galaxy, not out of it).

To find out if they are visiting Earth, we must first find how many of these species has mastered fast interstellar travel. Without this number at hand, you can't proof one way or another. Because, let's say, if there are 1000 species that have interstellar travelling, it would take one of them just a few hundrend years to decide to check out Earth, because Earth is one of the candidates. There might be 50,000 good candidates in the  galaxy, but dividing 50,000/1000 shows us that it is possible to be discovered  by one of them pretty &quot;fast&quot;.

Of course, the 50,000/1000 are totally random numbers, so we can't proof anything with it. It could very well be 10000000/5, or even 50/100000, we don't know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&gt;I still heard no arguments that exposes the flaw in my reasoning.</p>
	<p>Let&#8217;s assume two things:<br />
1. Infinite number of alien species exist.<br />
2. SOME of them can do interstellar travel (in our galaxy, not out of it).</p>
	<p>To find out if they are visiting Earth, we must first find how many of these species has mastered fast interstellar travel. Without this number at hand, you can&#8217;t proof one way or another. Because, let&#8217;s say, if there are 1000 species that have interstellar travelling, it would take one of them just a few hundrend years to decide to check out Earth, because Earth is one of the candidates. There might be 50,000 good candidates in the  galaxy, but dividing 50,000/1000 shows us that it is possible to be discovered  by one of them pretty &#8220;fast&#8221;.</p>
	<p>Of course, the 50,000/1000 are totally random numbers, so we can&#8217;t proof anything with it. It could very well be 10000000/5, or even 50/100000, we don&#8217;t know.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-314</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-314</guid>
					<description>As for UFOs... If I see a light bobbing somewhere, I do not assume it's a UFO. I assume it's something else. And then I forget about the incident.

The more you talk about it, the more important, and therefore the more real, it gets. 15 years is a mighty long time.

After 2 years of Psychology, if there's one thing I know, it's that the human mind cannot be trusted. I have read gazillion studies on human recollection, and they all confirm one thing: the human mind is a mess when it comes to recollection. It adds details, removes details, changes stuff around, distorts perception of time, and what not.

That's the big problem with these so-called UFO encounters and abductee stories. They're all based on recollections from the human mind, and hence, are not to be trusted. At all. I wouldn't even trust myself were I to ecnounter a UFO and tell people about it.

Give me real-life proof of a UFO. Film the damn thing. Give me alien bodies. Give me scientific proof of the existence of alien visists to our world. &lt;i&gt;Then&lt;/i&gt;, and &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; then, might I believe you that aliens visit our world.

Not a millisecond sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As for UFOs&#8230; If I see a light bobbing somewhere, I do not assume it&#8217;s a UFO. I assume it&#8217;s something else. And then I forget about the incident.</p>
	<p>The more you talk about it, the more important, and therefore the more real, it gets. 15 years is a mighty long time.</p>
	<p>After 2 years of Psychology, if there&#8217;s one thing I know, it&#8217;s that the human mind cannot be trusted. I have read gazillion studies on human recollection, and they all confirm one thing: the human mind is a mess when it comes to recollection. It adds details, removes details, changes stuff around, distorts perception of time, and what not.</p>
	<p>That&#8217;s the big problem with these so-called UFO encounters and abductee stories. They&#8217;re all based on recollections from the human mind, and hence, are not to be trusted. At all. I wouldn&#8217;t even trust myself were I to ecnounter a UFO and tell people about it.</p>
	<p>Give me real-life proof of a UFO. Film the damn thing. Give me alien bodies. Give me scientific proof of the existence of alien visists to our world. <i>Then</i>, and <i>only</i> then, might I believe you that aliens visit our world.</p>
	<p>Not a millisecond sooner.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-313</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-313</guid>
					<description>Well, not a specific reply, but more a general one.

My argumentation was more theoretical than it was practical. I was using strict logic and reasoning to make a point-- most of the repliers here started using examples, terminology from scifi shows, ifs and buts, and what not. That was &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; my intention. I was reasoning the same way Descartes was reasoning when he thought up one of the most famous lines in philospohy-- &lt;i&gt;je pense, donc je suis&lt;/i&gt; (I think, therefore, I am).

Using nothing more than logic and reasoning, and the most common scientific viewpoint on the size of the universe (which, as Kitty pointed out, was a false assumption on my end but that is beside the point), one can proove, rationally, logically, that lifeforms outside of our planet exist (namely, an infinite amount), but that they do not visit earth (namely, because there is an infinite amount of planets more interesting and more valuable).

I still heard no arguments that exposes the flaw in my reasoning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, not a specific reply, but more a general one.</p>
	<p>My argumentation was more theoretical than it was practical. I was using strict logic and reasoning to make a point&#8211; most of the repliers here started using examples, terminology from scifi shows, ifs and buts, and what not. That was <i>not</i> my intention. I was reasoning the same way Descartes was reasoning when he thought up one of the most famous lines in philospohy&#8211; <i>je pense, donc je suis</i> (I think, therefore, I am).</p>
	<p>Using nothing more than logic and reasoning, and the most common scientific viewpoint on the size of the universe (which, as Kitty pointed out, was a false assumption on my end but that is beside the point), one can proove, rationally, logically, that lifeforms outside of our planet exist (namely, an infinite amount), but that they do not visit earth (namely, because there is an infinite amount of planets more interesting and more valuable).</p>
	<p>I still heard no arguments that exposes the flaw in my reasoning.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-312</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2005/11/28/simple-logic/#comment-312</guid>
					<description>You can claim whatever you want Kitty. And I claim that I saw a UFO 15 years ago (along with others that night). Could it be an American experiemental aircraft? It could very well be, as a US/NATO base is only 30 khm away from the town I lived in. But it might have been the real deal too. And if it was the real deal, then there is a way to do interstellar travelling without smashing yourself in to a black hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You can claim whatever you want Kitty. And I claim that I saw a UFO 15 years ago (along with others that night). Could it be an American experiemental aircraft? It could very well be, as a US/NATO base is only 30 khm away from the town I lived in. But it might have been the real deal too. And if it was the real deal, then there is a way to do interstellar travelling without smashing yourself in to a black hole.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
