Figo fcuked us in the ass
June 25, 2006We were the stronger team, they were the smarter team. Figo fcuked us in the ass by faking a slap in the face. The referee deserves to be shot. I will personally pull the trigger. Scolari was annoying. We missed way too many chances.
My only comfort is that England will pulverise Portugal. Completely destroy them. Kill them. Make them bend over. Crush their spirits.
I am so fcuking pissed off right now. Do not come near me. I need to calm down. Time to update OSNews. Maybe I’ll write a column tonight after all.
World | 
No Fair Play, Holland didn’t deserve to win.
Comment by thebluesgnr — June 26, 2006 @ 1:27 am
No, Figo didn’t get slapped in the face, Boulahrouz ellbowed Figo in the face, and this was the same player that put Cristiano Ronaldo out of commision, and until someone proves me wrong, hitting Ronaldo ritgh on the begining of the game was a deliberate and programmed decision by the Ducth (read van Basten). So yeah, Stuff it!! :-P
Comment by Hugo — June 26, 2006 @ 9:24 am
Oh fcuk off, Figo was being a theaterplayer once again. It’s always the same with that guy. He didn’t get anything in the face, he was faking it, and everybody knows that.
The kick against Ronaldo was not deliberate. Figo’s faking, however, was.
Comment by Administrator — June 26, 2006 @ 9:39 am
On top of that, he head-butted Van Bommel.
Comment by Administrator — June 26, 2006 @ 9:47 am
He didn’t get anything in the face, he was faking it, and everybody knows that.
Everyone in the Netherlands perhaps, to the rest of world he was elbowed:
“Next off in the 62nd minute was Khalid Boulahrouz who, for his part, tried to reshape Figo’s nose with an accurately placed elbow.”
and so on, i’m sure you can read google news just like everybody else…
Comment by Hugo — June 26, 2006 @ 10:08 am
Why don’t you look at the images yourself? It is 100% perfectly, crystal clear that this was NO elbow. Did they touch? Oh yes. Was it hard? Oh no.
Again, this confirms the general opinion in The Netherlands, the UK, and Scandinavia that South-European football is anti-football. Almost all South-European players are a bunch of nancies who scream and fall over by the lightest of touches, completely ruining football– exactly, anti-football.
Too bad the people high up in the FIFA are all French, Italian, and Spanish. As long as that’s the case, nancy-football will reign supreme in the world, instead of the more physical, men’s variant as seen in Northern Europe.
Comment by Administrator — June 26, 2006 @ 10:26 am
That’s your opinion, we think that Boulahrouz ellbowing Figo and sending Cristiano Ronaldo to the hospital is anti-football. Perhaps that explains why your coach didn’t put van Nistelrooy to play even you dutch needed to score, he must be a nancy as well…
Comment by Hugo — June 26, 2006 @ 10:47 am
It made perfect sense to choose Kuyt over Van Nistelrooij. Ruud is a pretty-boy football player, he waits until the ball comes to him- while Kuyt goes and gets the ball himself. Kuyt made sense.
Secondly, it also made perfect sense to bring Vennegoor Of Hesselink into the game– he is one of them players that can break open a game, while also being phyisically very strong.
Both Kuyt as well as VoH are technically inferior to Van Nistelrooij, but that was the exact point.
Comment by Administrator — June 26, 2006 @ 10:53 am
Yes, it made so much sense that YOU LOST THE GAME because they can’t score goals.
Comment by Hugo — June 26, 2006 @ 11:10 am
We lost the game because in the 2nd half, there was no game, all due to the ref. If the clock was stopepd everytime someone lay down, or anytime the ref lost it, we’d still be playing now.
But oh well, English will finish it off. Portugal is too weak.
Comment by Administrator — June 26, 2006 @ 11:15 am
Well, all in all, very many players on both sides acted a lot. Still - and I’m no fan of either the Netherlands or Portugal - I felt the N. players were too tough in the beginning and then P. players started to behave the same.
In the end, I was happy with it, because this was the most enjoyable and exciting game up to now.
Comment by l3v1 — June 26, 2006 @ 11:23 am
I’m sorry Administrator but what they did to C. Ronaldo is not how men play football. Them not giving the ball back to Portugal when the ref stopped the game is not how men play football.
The Holland time had an extra player for a while and they didn’t take advantage of it. Instead of working the ball all we saw we’re long balls, which made the game pretty easy for Portugal. The players had everything to tie the game and they couldn’t keep it together.
You can cry all you want, but I’ll say it again: your team didn’t deserve to win. But the worst part is that you seem to think violence is not only ok, but it’s how the game should be played! Too bad you didn’t see Holland in 74.
Comment by thebluesgnr — June 26, 2006 @ 6:06 pm
You must get used to loose against Portugal!!!! It’s the second time in two years! First, the European Cup, now the World Cup!
You had a weaker team, you didn’t score, and you didn’t do fair-play.
Get used to it and stop blaming Figo or someone else.
Comment by Frankie — June 27, 2006 @ 1:35 pm
WE didn’t do fairplay? What about Figo’s headbut? His schwalbe? What about the hundreds of harsh fauls commited by the Portugese?? Did you see the same “match” I did?
Comment by Administrator — June 27, 2006 @ 1:48 pm
But you said the portuguese play like nancies, how could we have commited hundreds of harsh faults?? ROTFL
And how come the germans at the stadium started chanting and rooting for Portugal all the way through the second half? I’ll tell you why, because Holland didn’t play fair. Deco and Costinha got a red card for their stupidity, they didn’t hurt anyone, unlike the dutch players that got the red card.
Comment by Hugo — June 27, 2006 @ 5:51 pm