The purity of English

September 15, 2006

Language is an ever-changing entity. Language morphs, changes. New words are formed, old words assume new meanings. Old sayings die out, new ones arise.

For this sole reason, complaining about language deterioration is like complaining about water being wet. English is one of the most heavily influenced languages in the world, and has been so for centuries. Due to Viking conquests, French occupation, and heavy Latin influences, about 67% of the English vocabulary is derived from languages other than (old-)English. In fact, about 1% of the English vocabulary stems from… Dutch, due to the Golden Age (1600-1700), when we basically ruled the world.

So, complaining about the purity of English, or the fact that expressions are used in the wrong contexts, is utterly pointless, and kind of hypocritical, at best. If you are so concerned over the purity of English, you better drop 67% of the words you use today.

As some of you may know, I now do a language study at university. English, with some social/communication sciences attached.

1 Message »

  1. I agree! Faltakan gok son dwala korofar veriys thiniamel!

    Comment by BTQ — September 17, 2006 @ 1:49 pm

RSS feed for messages on this post.

Leave a message

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> .

Please use the blockquote tag to quote. Comments containing quotes in other ways will be deleted.


-