<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GNOME</title>
	<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/01/28/gnome/</link>
	<description>I'm feeling pretty good about myself right about now.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: abraxas</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/01/28/gnome/#comment-3373</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/01/28/gnome/#comment-3373</guid>
					<description>Mono is free software.  Flash is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mono is free software.  Flash is not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/01/28/gnome/#comment-3371</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/01/28/gnome/#comment-3371</guid>
					<description>First off: I'm using KDE 4.2 right now.
Second: stop beeing a fanboyish crybaby.

Why does the whole world have to complement the KDE team for releasing their software?
We should complement them for releasing bug free software, which KDE 4.2 ain't!

They have made some improvements with this release by eradicating bugs, but does that justify praising it to the skies?
Try to be a little more objective. It doesnt do the trick for me just having a little less bugs.
No major bugs, that's what we'd agree upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>First off: I&#8217;m using KDE 4.2 right now.<br />
Second: stop beeing a fanboyish crybaby.</p>
	<p>Why does the whole world have to complement the KDE team for releasing their software?<br />
We should complement them for releasing bug free software, which KDE 4.2 ain&#8217;t!</p>
	<p>They have made some improvements with this release by eradicating bugs, but does that justify praising it to the skies?<br />
Try to be a little more objective. It doesnt do the trick for me just having a little less bugs.<br />
No major bugs, that&#8217;s what we&#8217;d agree upon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: yelamdenu</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/01/28/gnome/#comment-3370</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/01/28/gnome/#comment-3370</guid>
					<description>(FTR, I use Gnome but I think KDE 4 is impressive.)
I'm not sure Mono is that controversial when it comes to Gnome. There are no Mono dependencies in Gnome, and Mono is fully open source; the patent stuff is all bogus anyway so I don't see how this is that bad.

But you're right Thom, the KDE vs Gnome politics is silly. I for one think Gnome should be a little more worried about KDE's progress, even though there is little to fear for the next couple of years since Ubuntu is basically Gnome.
&quot;De wet van de remmende voorsprong&quot;? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>(FTR, I use Gnome but I think KDE 4 is impressive.)<br />
I&#8217;m not sure Mono is that controversial when it comes to Gnome. There are no Mono dependencies in Gnome, and Mono is fully open source; the patent stuff is all bogus anyway so I don&#8217;t see how this is that bad.</p>
	<p>But you&#8217;re right Thom, the KDE vs Gnome politics is silly. I for one think Gnome should be a little more worried about KDE&#8217;s progress, even though there is little to fear for the next couple of years since Ubuntu is basically Gnome.<br />
&#8220;De wet van de remmende voorsprong&#8221;? ;-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Edwin</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/01/28/gnome/#comment-3369</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/01/28/gnome/#comment-3369</guid>
					<description>It's not the only entry. There's also a positive/congratulatory entry from Jason Clinton listed on there, dated January 26th called 'KDE 4.2 rocks'... Direct link: http://jasondclinton.livejournal.com/71412.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s not the only entry. There&#8217;s also a positive/congratulatory entry from Jason Clinton listed on there, dated January 26th called &#8216;KDE 4.2 rocks&#8217;&#8230; Direct link: <a href='http://jasondclinton.livejournal.com/71412.html' rel='nofollow'>http://jasondclinton.livejournal.com/71412.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

