<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welfare, II</title>
	<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/05/04/welfare-ii/</link>
	<description>I'm a mere, tiny, insignificant cog in a whole clockwork of stupidity. I'm the tiny cog that wants to break free. Seriously.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: kaiwai</title>
		<link>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/05/04/welfare-ii/#comment-3565</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:35:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2009/05/04/welfare-ii/#comment-3565</guid>
					<description>The problem with the welfare state is in the case of New Zealand it almost bankrupted it. The Netherlands is lucky given that it has a decent size population, it is on the door step to a large economic zone and more importantly the historical ties that it has with other countries.

When you look at the welfare state model in most other countries it is a mess, France and Sweden being two examples of stagnation, declining populations and mediocrity par excellence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The problem with the welfare state is in the case of New Zealand it almost bankrupted it. The Netherlands is lucky given that it has a decent size population, it is on the door step to a large economic zone and more importantly the historical ties that it has with other countries.</p>
	<p>When you look at the welfare state model in most other countries it is a mess, France and Sweden being two examples of stagnation, declining populations and mediocrity par excellence.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
