Cookies

October 30, 2007

Apple chief executive Steve Jobs is reportedly “very interested” in a world where people share their WiFi connections in return for free access to other wireless hotspots in their communities, and recently met with the founder of upstart provider FON, whose business aims might just dovetail with the iPhone maker.

I fully agree with Jobs. I have my own wireless network, of course, and it’s completely open. No pass phrases, no WPA, nothing. If you happen to walk by with a WiFi enabled device, you are free to join my network and use it to browse the internet. I really don’t care. Of course, I live in East Bumblefcuk and nobody ever visits this god forsaken outpost of human civilisation, but it’s the principle that counts.

I believe in the ubiquity of internet access, and so should you. So open up your wireless network (secure your own PCs well, of course), and allow passers by to use it.

For cookies.

Total

October 17, 2007

I have a Dell Inspiron 6000. It’s a gift from OSNews’ owner, David Adams. It’s 18 months old now.

And it’s a complete and utter disaster, from a quality point of view. The screen hinges are broken. The paint is chipping off everywhere, even though the laptop never leaves my apartment. Keys on the keyboard are coming off. The battery started losing its strength within a few months, and since about 8 months, it’s been dead completely. And now, the power adapter is broken. Dead. Useless.

Conclusion: I have a dead laptop, and buying a new battery and adapter is all I can do - a total of 180 EUR. I don’t think I’ll be spending such an amount of money on this laptop.

Pong

September 28, 2007

Look what I ordered from t3h 1nterw3b today…

Pong was my very first contact with the world of computers. We had a small orange Pong machine at home - a Binatone Mk. 6. It was a Mk. IV, actually.

The woman’s voice undulated

September 22, 2007

I just had one of the weirdest experiences ever.

Here I was, watching the evening news/discussion program, about the Dutch military effort in Afghanistan. At the same time, I’m browsing OSNews, reading/making comments. All of a sudden, my ears pick up some faint static - the static a radio produces when it is in AM mode. My ears are extremely keen, so even the faintest of noises make it to my brain.

Anyway, the static turned louder, and all of a sudden, I heard voices. I could clearly hear a German woman speaking about “Korea”. It was difficult to make out individual words, but from the woman’s intonation I could make out it was a news programme. I immediately muted my TV, and located the sound from the speakers of my Apple Cube (my main computer). My first response was to see if there were any audio ads in Safari - but I was browsing OSNews, and we don’t run audio ads (I’d go on strike if we did).

I grabbed the (non-cordless) remote control to my Creative iTrigue speaker set, and max’d out the volume. The static and the woman’s voice undulated, from loud, to faint, and back again, for a few times - until it disappeared. Flabbergasted, I sat there. In the back of my head, that Mythbusters episode about that woman receiving radio signals through her teeth popped up. I swiftly fired up Google, and it promptly gave me a reply.

Thank you Google, for reassuring me I’m not going crazy.

Mr Carpet

September 18, 2007

My Inspiron 6000 was getting very hot lately - say, the past four months. Where the fan barely kicked in during the early days of the laptop, it spun almost continuously these days. This got me worried, and today, I took the entire laptop apart. Only to discover carpet had actually grown inside the laptop - right between the entrance to the fan cavity and the heatpipe.


Why hello there, Mr Carpet!.

I took Mr Carpet out of the fan cavity, and looked at him for a while. Then came big Mr Grumpy Vacuum Cleaner, and up, up and away Mr Carpet went. I imagined a faint ‘heeeeeeeeeelp’.

My Inspiron’s now back to cool and quiet service.

Τάνταλος torture

September 12, 2007

Some… Interesting responses to the big QNX news and interview today.

I have been called ‘unethical’ for saying “QNX is opening up its source code”. A reader on OSNews claims that with that, I am “redefining” the meaning of open source - and that’s what he calls unethical. Ridiculous, of course. The code is open. You can look at it. Compile it. Change it. Alter it. For personal use. You can keep those changes for yourself. You can share those changes with the QNX community. You just can’t sell those changes - you can’t exploit your work commercially. In order to do that, you need to pay royalties to QNX.

Which makes total sense.

Unlike other companies such as IBM and Sun, QSS is actually quite a small company. The only stream of revenue the company has is its operating system and the services it provides. Compare this to a big shot like Sun, who does not only sell a boatload of software and services, but also has an extremely important hardware business. Sun can afford to be ‘more’ open source than QNX simply because to Sun, Solaris is financially actually fairly irrelevant. It’s by far not their greatest source of income.

QSS (QNX Software Systems) has done the right thing by their hybrid software model. They allow everyone to look at the code, download it, compile it, change it, share it with their peers or keep it to themselves, heck, they can even make a distribution and put that online - they are just not allowed to sell it. Which is logical, because else the ‘altered’ QNX versions would directly compete with QSS, and seeing those altered versions would leech for 99% off QSS’s hard work, they would be infinitely cheaper (if not free).

On top of that, by choosing this model, they made sure that their biggest competitors (VxWorks, Microsoft, and commercial Linux ‘embedders’) are forced into a ‘Τάνταλος torture‘ - they can look at it all they want, but they cannot use it for their own good.

I’m sure a healthy community can be built around QNX. I sure hope it can, in any case.

Nice laptop

September 11, 2007

Darn, this is a nice laptop. Small, optional red colour, Core 2 Duo, Intel videochipset. Nice, nice, nice.

A thing or two

August 30, 2007

I regularly wonder, how on earth do you teach your children proper use of the computer?

On the ‘children’s news’ just now, they reported on an application for Windows which parents can use to timely shut down a computer. This functionality is of course built-in into Vista and OS X (parental controls), so I don’t really know why they had to report on this particular application, but hey.

I just don’t get this. What kind of parent are you if you cannot even control your own chlidren’s computer usage? When I was younger, my parents weren’t exactly very strict on this issue - they gave me enough time to play on the computer, and they quite effectively distributed computer time between my two older brothers and I. However, when my parents said, “and now it’s enough, shut the thing down”, I did just that. Of course, I did try to sneak in an extra few minutes, and of course tried to whine until they let me play longer, but in the end, when my parents really said “end”, it really did mean “end”.

I can remember one time I was playing Age Of Empires online, and since I did not want to ruin my online ranking, I kept on playing despite my father telling me to stop - he went back the living room. Since I didn’t stop, my father got quite angry (and rightly so), and after that, I never did it again. That is proper parenting.

I really don’t understand the present day culture in parenting; parents try to shove all responsibilities they have as parents towards the schools and teachers, the government, to programs that block computer usage, censorship, and more of that nonsense. ‘Modern’ parents in this country expect schools to teach their children morals and values, because they themselves are too busy at work and going out. They expect the government to teach their children condom use, the dangers of smoking and - of course, our biggest problem - alcohol (ab)use. And now, they expect computer programs to stop their children from sitting behind their computers for too long.

But in the end, all these things won’t properly raise children. Children ought to be raised by their parents. That is your job as a mother and father. Sure, it ain’t easy, but did anyone ever say it was? As a parent, you have to be strict, but at the same time, you need to be able to compromise. You need to make harsh decisions, but you also need to know when to let your children decide for themselves. And to make matters worse, each of your children requires its own specific parenting style - trust me, my own parents know a thing or two about that one.

You also cannot just take the easy way out - prohibing your children from everything won’t exactly work. It’s the classic story of Bluebeard - tell someone he can enter every room in the house except one, which room will that someone most desire to enter? Prohibiting your child form doing anything even remotely dangerous will not help in raising him - in fact, it will make him weak, unable to cope with the harshness of real life. In other words, a pussy.

My children will most likely be taught computer usage the way my parents taught me. Sure, you can use the computer, and do whatever you want with it. But when I say schluss, it’s schluss. If I have to rely on software parental controls, I probably failed as a father.

Just saying

August 12, 2007

My dream operating system would have BeOS’ kernel, responsiveness, and soul. Mac OS X’ attention to detail and polishedness. Windows’ industry support. Linux’ price tag. VMS’ stability. OpenBSD’s security. My nightmare operating system would have the Linux kernel. Windows’ attention to detail and polishedness. SkyOS’ industry support. Vista’s pricetag. Windows 98’s stability. BeOS’ security.

Just saying.

The joy of waiting

May 31, 2007

Warning: rant ahead.

I don’t give a rat’s ass what all the anti-MS idiots say. Surface is a truly innovative product, and I applaud Microsoft for it. They had the guts, back in 2001, to devote money and manpower to this idea, and now, 6 years later, it is paying off. Surface looks great, opens up a whole slew of possibilities, and, as far as I can see it, is truly a Pandora’s box of opportunities. I’ve seen use cases flash before my eyes like every other minute of the past two days.

Surface is just one of those things the OSS community will never come up with. Let’s face it; Linux, BSD, most of the other OSS projects, they are all followers. They are in it to regurgitate what companies like Apple and Microsoft serve them. The OSS community is supposed to be so great, right? Then why is it that they never seem to be able to come with something truly new, something groundbreaking, something that will make people all around the world go: “wow…!” I showed Surface to some of my computer-illetrate friends, and they were baffled. They all saw new use cases in front of them… Just like I did.

Fact remains, as much as I like the OSS world (I try to use the OSS equiv. when it is at least as good as or better than the closed-source counterparts), they are followers, not trendsetters. So, sure, there is enough to bash Microsoft and Apple about, but at least they have the guts to come up with truly new ideas.

In 2010, we’ll see a marginally different, poor rip-off of Surface. The joy of waiting.

Older entries - Newer entries